Sunday, April 24, 2011

Ethical Responsibilities of the Researcher


Ethics are the simplest things the world; do what’s right and treat people nicely.  That’s really the whole entirety of the discussion.  Questions only arise when the researcher lacks the knowledge of what is right and what treating people nicely mean.

I’m struck by Jeanette in the video not wanting to share her research with those around her.  It is more than likely if you need to be sneaky and secretive about your research, you probably on thin ice regarding ethics.  Jeanette hesitation regarding her research had nothing to do with influencing the research, but instead had to do with her personal fears of her colleagues’ responses.  Her research on gender bias of reading material didn’t require any type of experimental blind that would required hiding some elements of the research from those participating in the study.  Mills states “There is no room for deception in action research.”

I do think that there is a place in research for testing people based on unknowns.  These are situations where informing the participants of the study about key elements would have an influence in the study.  I think these can be more complex than what we typically see in action research.  Nevertheless, you have a responsibility to allow for informed consent.  You have to ensure that you give as much information as possible to those in the study.   Once the study is complete, you can then inform the individuals about the details of the study and offer a no pressure opt out.

Doug’s video, while lacking detail about his individual study, showed the lengths that a researcher must go towards to ensure they avoid ethical dilemmas.  The primary way Doug did this is by simply informing everyone involved.  He sent consent letters to the parents explaining the who’s, why’s and how’s of his action research.  It’s also important that he included the students on the information loop.  His openness with them probably led toward a more trusting and open environment.  In all likelihood, it probably led to higher quality action research project.

I’ll restate the ethical responsibilities of the researcher: do what’s right and treat people nicely.  If you ever have a decision to make, always choose the path of disclosure and openness.

Sunday, April 17, 2011

Curtis Elementary Case Study


The following is my critique of the Curtis Elementary Case Study:

1.       Area of focus-Does the area of focus involve teaching and learning?

Without question, the area of focus involves learning and teaching.  Jonathan is questioning his teaching methods and the impact of those methods on student learning.

2.       Research questions-Does the researcher state questions that were answerable given the researcher’s expertise, time and resources?

By limiting himself to one question, Jonathan’s study was able to make sure that his question was answerable given his expertise, time and resources.

3.       Locus of control-Was the area of focus within the researcher’s locus of control?

Given the school wide involvement in action research, it would be easy for a researcher to have an area of focus that was to wide, but Jonathan limited himself to just his students and his curriculum changes.

4.       Data collection-Did the researcher use appropriate data collection techniques to answer the study’s research questions?

Jonathan used appropriate data collection techniques to answer his study’s research questions?  He included both qualitative (interviews, observations) and quantitative (assessment scores) techniques, that provided a well-rounded data set.

5.       Ethics-Did the research face any ethical challenges?  If so, how were they resolved?

The research does not appear to have faced any ethical challenges.

6.       Reflective stance-In what ways has the action research effort contributed to the researcher’s reflective stance on the ways teaching and learning are viewed?

Jonathan appears to be continuing his action research process the following year.  This shows me that he has truly embraced a reflective stance.


7.       Action-Did the outcomes of the study lead to action?

Jonathon’s vocabulary reinforcement will be extended throughout the following areas of reading and written expression with his students: group novels, published poetry, current events, magazines, storytelling collections, student-created stories, narratives, opinion papers, descriptions, research papers and oral presentations.

He also plans to use various techniques to monitor, modify and evaluate the impact and effectiveness of his vocabulary intensification efforts.

8.       Action-data connection-How is the proposed action connected to the study’s data analysis and interpretation?


There appears to be a strong action-data connection based on the information provided by Jonathon.   His proposed plan of action is clearly based on the data he collected, analyzed and interpreted.

Sunday, April 3, 2011

Potential researcher biases


It’s impossible for a researcher not to carry biases into their work.  An effective researcher will be aware of these biases.  This awareness allows researchers to monitor the effects of these biases on their work and adjust accordingly.

With my research topic, does increased technology in classrooms improve test scores; I am carrying several biases into the study.  First and foremost, I have witnessed the marginalization of teachers.  The respect for the profession has decreased a great deal of the recent past.  I think a growing number of people feel that the teacher’s job is simply administrative and that the education of students can be effectively out sources to technology.  I believe that, and I have to be careful about this beliefs influence on my study.  

Another bias that piggy-backs on the previous one is the reallocation of funds away from education professional and towards electronic gadgetry.  I am constantly hearing stories of increased classroom sizes, because of under staffing, but at the same school, students will be provided ipods and/or laptops.  The clear implication is that technology, not education professionals are the key to a successful education.